Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Harbour (Toronto)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:29, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Harbour (Toronto) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Condominium towers in a city with many. Little or no discussion of the topic in media. Nothing substantive anyway. No architectural awards or merit that I could find. Fails WP:NBUILD Alaney2k (talk) 18:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:59, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Daniel K. Ray (1991). Water Works, 1991: A Survey of Great Lakes/St. Lawrence River Waterfront Development. Harbor House Publishers. pp. 10, 60. ISBN 9780921578062.
  • Adele Freedman (1990). Sight Lines: Looking at Architecture and Design in Canada. Oxford University Press. p. 186. ISBN 9780195407105.
  • Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront (1992). David Crombie (ed.). Regeneration; Toronto's Waterfront and the Sustainable City : Final Report. pp. 290–294. ISBN 9780660144009.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.